top of page

Building In-House AI: Hype or Strategic Advantage?

  • Oriental Tech ESC
  • May 26
  • 4 min read

As a recruiter working with IT Directors and key decision-makers in banking and insurance companies, I’m witnessing a surge in excitement about in-house AI systems. Inspired by companies like DeepSeek, which reportedly trained its V3 model for just US$6 million compared to OpenAI’s US$100 million for GPT-4, many executives believe downloading pre-trained AI models for in-house use is a quick, cost-effective solution. But as I discuss with IT leaders, the reality of in-house AI is far more complex than the hype suggests. It demands significant investment, infrastructure, and strategic planning. Here’s what corporations in regulated industries like banking and insurance need to consider before taking the plunge.



The DeepSeek Hype and Hidden Realities

DeepSeek, a China-based AI company founded in July 2023, has shaken up the AI landscape with its cost-efficient approach. Its R1 model, launched in January 2025, is said to be 20–50 times cheaper to use than OpenAI’s o1, thanks to techniques like Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) and optimized Nvidia H800 GPUs. However, the widely cited US$6 million training cost for V3 likely excludes substantial research and hardware expenses, with some estimates suggesting a total closer to US$1 billion (MIT Technology Review). This creates a misconception among executives that downloading and using pre-trained AI models in-house is a low-cost, plug-and-play solution. For non-tech firms, the reality involves navigating significant costs and strategic trade-offs.


Why Choose In-House AI?

For many corporations, particularly in the FSI sectors such as Banks and Insurance companies, the goal isn’t to train new AI models but to download pre-trained large language models (LLMs) from platforms like Hugging Face for in-house AI Inferencing use. This approach offers compelling benefits tailored to regulated industries:


  • Data Privacy and Security: Keeping sensitive customer data within the company’s infrastructure ensures compliance with regulations like GDPR and CCPA, reducing the risk of data breaches.

  • Intellectual Property Protection: In-house AI safeguards proprietary algorithms and trade secrets, avoiding exposure to external providers.

  • Regulatory Compliance: With some regions mandating local data processing, in-house systems help meet legal requirements and avoid penalties.

  • Avoiding Vendor Lock-In: Relying on external AI providers can lead to dependency on their pricing and terms. In-house AI offers greater autonomy and control.

  • Industry-Specific Customization: Tailored AI solutions are critical for tasks like fraud detection, risk assessment, or customer service, where generic cloud services may fall short.

  • Long-Term Cost Efficiency: For large-scale operations, in-house systems may reduce recurring fees to external AI providers, despite high initial investments.


The True Costs of In-House AI

While downloading a pre-trained AI model avoids the massive expense of training, setting up and maintaining an in-house AI system is far from inexpensive. Key cost drivers include:

  • Hardware Infrastructure: High-performance GPUs and servers, essential for running AI models, can cost tens of thousands to millions, depending on scale. Unlike tech giants, most banks and insurers lack the resources for massive GPU clusters, which can lead to slower performance compared to cloud solutions.

  • Skilled Talent: Data scientists (US$120,000–$161,590/year) and developers (US$100,000/year and up) are critical for managing models, optimizing performance, and ensuring security. Finding and retaining this expertise is a significant expense.

  • Ongoing Maintenance: Regular updates, monitoring for performance degradation (e.g., model drift), and compliance with regulations add to long-term costs. Custom AI solutions can range from $6,000 for basic chatbots to over $300,000 for complex systems.

In contrast, cloud-based AI services like Drift ($400–$1,500/month) or TARS ($99–$499/month) offer lower upfront costs but may not meet stringent privacy, compliance, or customization needs. For regulated industries, the higher costs of in-house AI may be justified, but they challenge the notion that it’s a “cheap” solution.



Strategic Considerations for Success

Before committing to in-house AI, corporations must align their decision with business goals and operational realities. Key questions to ask include:

  • Budget and Infrastructure: Can your organization afford the hardware and talent required? Non-tech firms often lack the scale for massive infrastructure, which may lead to performance trade-offs.

  • Performance Needs: Can your applications tolerate moderate delays? For example, fraud detection may work with in-house systems, but real-time needs like customer service chatbots may favor cloud solutions.

  • Privacy and IP Protection: Are data security and intellectual property concerns critical enough to justify the investment? In regulated industries, this is often a primary driver.

  • Regulatory Requirements: Do local laws mandate in-house data processing? This is especially relevant for firms with international operations.

  • Long-Term Vision: Does in-house AI align with your strategic goals, such as cost savings for large-scale operations or tailored solutions for unique use cases?

For many firms, a hybrid approach—using in-house AI for sensitive tasks and cloud services for less critical ones—strikes the right balance between cost, compliance, and performance.



Final Thoughts

In-house AI offers banks and insurers significant advantages: enhanced data privacy, IP protection, regulatory compliance, and tailored solutions. However, the idea that it’s a low-cost, quick fix, fueled by DeepSeek’s reported efficiencies, overlooks the substantial investments in hardware, talent, and maintenance. Corporations must weigh the benefits against the realities to make informed decisions.


Ask yourself:

  • ✔️ Is your budget ready for significant hardware and talent investments?

  • ✔️ Can your business accept potential performance trade-offs compared to cloud solutions?

  • ✔️ Are data privacy, IP protection, and compliance non-negotiable priorities?

  • ✔️ Does in-house AI align with your long-term strategic vision?


If you’re answering “yes” to most of these, in-house AI could be a transformative investment. If not, a hybrid or cloud-based approach may be more practical, leveraging external expertise while addressing specific needs.


IT leaders, what’s your perspective? Are you seeing a shift toward in-house AI in your organization, or is the cloud still the go-to solution?



My job? Connecting them with the talent that turns vision into reality

_________________________________________________________


Contact us and let us know your company's AI staffing requirement. Together, we can improve how we recruit for AI roles to benefit everyone involved.




Recent Posts

See All
bottom of page